Wednesday, December 10, 2025
HomeMoney MattersEconomicsShark Tank India: Anupam Mittal Slams Cushion Startup Over Branding Issues, Ritesh...

Shark Tank India: Anupam Mittal Slams Cushion Startup Over Branding Issues, Ritesh Agarwal Strikes Deal

Published:

The latest episode of Shark Tank India Season 4 turned heated when the founders of Trajectory-a Delhi-based cushion brand, faced tough scrutiny from the investors. Seeking ₹1 crore for a 2% equity stake, they valued their company at ₹50 crore, but their pitch quickly sparked criticism—especially from Anupam Mittal, who questioned their brand’s uniqueness in an already saturated market.

Anupam Mittal’s Blunt Remarks: “Kya Bakwas Kar Rahe Ho?”

From the start, Mittal expressed skepticism about the startup’s viability, interrupting co-founder Raghav and challenging their strategy. He dismissed their entry into the cushion industry as an unwise move, considering the presence of cheaper alternatives and established competitors.

The pitch took a controversial turn when Ritesh Agarwal pointed out that Trajectory’s logo bore a striking resemblance to Tesla’s, raising concerns about originality and brand identity. This sparked further grilling from the panel, with Aman Gupta and Namita Thapar questioning the company’s ability to establish a distinct brand presence.

Financial Strength Impresses Some Sharks

Despite the branding concerns, Trajectory’s financial performance—with a projected revenue of ₹15 crore and an EBITDA margin of 21%—caught the interest of some investors. Their distribution strategy, involving Amazon sales and airport retail outlets, also worked in their favor.

Final Deal with Ritesh Agarwal

While Anupam, Namita, and Aman backed out, citing concerns over branding and differentiation, Ritesh Agarwal saw potential in the company. He offered ₹50 lakh for a 3% equity stake, plus ₹50 lakh in debt at an 8% interest rate. The founders accepted the deal, agreeing to scaling conditions set by Agarwal.

This episode highlighted the importance of brand identity and differentiation, with investors emphasizing that even strong financials cannot compensate for weak branding in a competitive market.

Related articles

spot_img

Recent articles

spot_img

Social Media

0FansLike
0FollowersFollow
0FollowersFollow
0SubscribersSubscribe